Ecosystem services of Hyrcanian Forests based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) Method

Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Corresponding author, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

3 Prof. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics Department, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran

5 Ph.D., Agricultural Economics Department, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

6 Ph.D. Student, Agricultural Economics Department, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

Abstract

Background and objective: When evaluating the sustainability of any subject, appropriate indicators must be selected and utilized. The functions and services of forest ecosystems serve as indicators of their capacity and effectiveness. Therefore, to align with fundamental policies regarding forest resources and to facilitate planning, decision-making, and success in this field, it is crucial to fully understand these capacities and effective indicators. This research aims to identify, weight, and prioritize the functions of Hyrcanian forests in Iran based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) method.
Methodology: In this study, the functions, goods, and services of forest ecosystems were first extracted using the CICES method, which is recognized as one of the most comprehensive classification systems for ecosystem functions and services. Subsequently, the functions, goods, and services of Hyrcanian forests were identified through the Delphi method, incorporating insights from experts and specialists. Data were collected via field surveys, random sampling, questionnaires, and face-to-face interviews. The Delphi group comprised 50 experts in forest sciences with a minimum of five years of relevant experience who provided their opinions on the identification of functions, goods, and services related to Hyrcanian forest ecosystems. After preparing the questionnaire, respondents rated their answers using a five-point Likert scale. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which yielded a value of α = 0.97, confirming its reliability. Following the completion of the questionnaires by experts, multi-criteria decision-making methods were employed to determine the weight of the functions, goods, and services of Hyrcanian forests. These methods included Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) for calculating function weights and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for prioritization.
Results: Analysis of the questionnaire findings using the CICES method identified three functions and twenty services for the Hyrcanian forest ecosystem. Weighting results from the SWARA technique indicated that climate regulation, biodiversity, and genetic resources received the highest weights among the evaluated services. Additionally, the final weights derived from implementing gradual weighting evaluation techniques revealed that the regulating function (0.505) had the highest weight among all functions, followed by provisioning (0.248) and cultural (0.246) functions in subsequent priority order. Comparisons of prioritization among ARAS, TOPSIS, and SAW models showed similar results regarding function prioritization; however, the ARAS model exhibited a steeper slope in relative closeness to one compared to the other two models from various perspectives. Based on this finding and expert consensus, prioritization using the ARAS model was deemed more reflective of reality. Thus, the ARAS model is proposed as a suitable approach for prioritizing the functions, services, and goods of the Hyrcanian forest ecosystem.
Conclusion: According to results from the ARAS model, climate regulation, biodiversity, genetic resources, habitat services, and water cycle services rank as the first through fifth priority services within Hyrcanian forest ecosystems. Given the significance of regulating functions in these ecosystems and their beneficiaries, it is recommended that relevant organizations engage in more effective planning and management to ensure their protection and sustainability for present and future generations. Furthermore, maintaining ecosystem integrity is essential for promoting sustainable development while safeguarding environmental health.
 

Keywords

References

- Adhikari, S., Baral, H. and Nitschke, C.R., 2018. Identification, prioritization and mapping of ecosystem services in the Panchase Mountain Ecological Region of Western Nepal. Forests, 9(9): 554.
- Amirnejad, H. and Ataie Solout, K., 2011. Economic Valuation of Environmental Resources. Published by Avaye Masih, Sari, Iran, 428p (In Persian).
- Arsyah, U.I., Jalinus, N., Ambiyar, S., Arsyah, R.H. and Pratiwi, M., 2021. Analysis of the simple additive weighting method in educational aid decision making. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14): 2389-2396.
- Asgharpour, M.J., 2003. Multi-Criteria Decision Making. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
- Bakhtiari, F., Panahi, M., Karami, M., Ghodousi, J., Mashayekhi, Z. and Pourzadi, M., 2009. Economic valuation of soil nutrients retention function of Sabzkouh forests. Iranian Journal of Forest, 1(1): 69-81.
- Baskent, E.Z., 2020. A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests, 11(1): 102.
- Bera, B., Shit, P.K., Sengupta, N., Saha, S. and Bhattacharjee, S., 2022. Susceptibility of deforestation hotspots in Terai-Dooars belt of Himalayan foothills: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS models. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34: 8794-8806.
- Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., ... and Van Den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.
- De Groot, R., Brander, L., Van Der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., … and Van Beukering, P., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1: 50-61.
- Haines-Young, R. and Potschin-Young, M.B., 2018. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1): a policy brief. One Ecosystem, 3: e27108.
- Hajizadeh, H., Fallah, A. and Hosseini, S., 2023. Evaluation of forest ecosystem functions using integrated methods of multi-criteria decision making (Case study: Mazandaran provence, Shiadeh and Diva forest ecosystem). Ecology of Iranian Forest, 10(20): 33-42 (In Persian with English summary).
- Henareh Khalyani, J., Namiranain, M., Khodayee Tehrani, V. and Javanmiri Pour, M., 2015. Investigation of non-timber forest products and their contribution to poverty alleviation of rural communities in northern Zagros forests (Field force analysis of issues and problems). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 23(2): 307-319 (In Persian with English summary).
- Hosseini, S., Amirnejad, H. and Azadi, H., 2024. Impacts of Hyrcanian forest ecosystem loss: the case of Northern Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04408-1
- Hosseini, S., Amirnejad, H. and Oladi, J., 2017. The valuation of functions and services of forest ecosystem of Kiasar national park. Agricultural Economics, 11(1): 211-239 (In Persian with English summary).
- Hosseini, S., Oladi, J. and Amirnejad, H., 2021. The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(6): 9052-9075.
- Jalili Asle, H., Fallah, A., Oladi, J. and Hosseini, S., 2022. Prioritization of rural ecotourism target villages in the forest area of Babolakrood watershed. Village and Development, 25(3): 139-166 (In Persian with English summary).
- Kabiri Hendi, M., Mirkarimi, S.H. and Salmanmahiny, A., 2020. Cultural ecosystem services assessment in Golestan Province. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 5(2): 2560-2568 (In Persian with English summary).
- Karami, A., Karamshahi, A.A., Mirzei, J., Feghhi, J. and Makhdoum, M., 2022. Offer a practical model of criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management with resilience approach in the Zagros vegetation area (Case study: Totshami Watershed of Kermanshah province). Iranian Journal of Forest, 14(2): 105-117 (In Persian with English summary).
- Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E.K. and Turskis, Z., 2010. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2): 243-258.
- Lee, B., 2021. Perception and prioritization of ecosystem services from bamboo forest in Lao PDR: Case study of Sangthong District. Sustainability, 13(23): 13060.
- Mahmoudi, B. and Feghhi, J., 2017. Identify, classify and prioritize of Iranian forests services. Journal of Forest Resources Planning, 1(2): 46-56 (In Persian).
- Marvie Mohadjer, M.R., 2011. Silviculture. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran, 418p (In Persian).
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, 266p.
- Naji Maydani, A. and Abdulahi, A., 2014, Forest economy and its role in sustainable development. Proceedings of National Conference on New Approaches in Science of Management, Economics and Accounting. Babol, Iran, 21 May 2015: 14p (In Persian).
- Orsi, F., Ciolli, M., Primmer, E., Varumo, L. and Geneletti, D., 2020. Mapping hotspots and bundles of forest ecosystem services across the European Union. Land Use Policy, 99: 104840.
- Pahlavan, P., Hosseini, M. and Hosseini, S., 2022. Valuation of ecological services of Chaldarreh Forest Park in Tonekabon County, Iran using choice experiment method. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 30(2): 148-163 (In Persian with English summary).
- Pirikiya, M., Fallah, A., Amirnejad, H. and Mohamadi, J., 2018. The identification and prioritization of criteria and indicators for assessment of multiple ecosystem services using of multi-criteria decision making techniques entropy and TOPSIS in Darabkola watershed. Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 9(3): 79-100 (In Persian with English summary).
- Shamekhi, T. and Mirmohammadi, S.M., 2012. Challenges of Iran's forests and pastures and suggestions to solve the problems. Strategic Research Center, Strategic Report, 150: 31p (In Persian).
- Sieber, J. and Pons, M., 2015. Assessment of urban ecosystem services using ecosystem services reviews and GIS-based Tools. Procedia Engineering, 115: 53-60.
- Skulmoski, G.J., Hartman, F.T. and Krahn, J., 2007. The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6: 1-21.
- Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2023a. Estimation of nature tourism carrying capacity in the mangrove forests of Khamir and Qeshm. Iranian Journal of Forest, 15(4): 377-392 (In Persian with English summary).
- Sobhani, P. and Danehkar, A., 2023b. Evaluating and zoning of ecosystem services in mangrove forests of Khamir and Qeshm. Town and Country Planning, 15(2): 275-292 (In Persian with English summary).
- Tupenaite, L., Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Seniut, M., 2010. Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(2): 257-266.
- Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. and Tamosaitiene, J., 2010. Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1): 33-46.
Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research
Volume 32, Issue 3 - Serial Number 97
December 2024
Pages 249-265

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics