Performance of thresher using two types of knives in compost production for forest nurseries

Document Type : Scientific article

Authors

1 Research Expert, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)

2 Senior Research Expert, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)

Abstract

Plant residue of forest nurseries is among the best available raw materials for producing compost to amend and strengthen forest nurseries soil. The size of raw materials has a major effect on shortening the time of composting as well as on increasing its quality. The mechanism, availability and working convenience with the threshers in different site conditions to convert plant residue into small pieces that are suitable for composting shows the suitability of threshers for such tasks. In this research, two kinds of knives with flat and sharp edges applicable to threshers were designed and applied to study the crushing quality of common plant residues. Treatments included pine cones, branches of deciduous, pine branches, coarse plants, herbs and pine needles. The performance of both flat and sharp edge knives were evaluated in a design with three repetitions. For most samples, the results showed that performance of the sharp knife exceeded that of flat knife. The crushing quality of different materials in different dimensions were significantly different at the α = 0.01 level. The time performance of sharp knife with an average mean 0.069290 kg per second was far better than flat knife with an average mean of 0.035661 kg per second. Sharp knife performed best for grinding pine cones with an average 0.01321 kg per second. Generally, more uniform and brittle plant residue can be crushed in a shorter time. Finally, the efficiency of threshers system with the designed knife is acceptable and suitable for the crushing of plant residue.

Keywords

References

- Cooperband, L., 2002. The Art and Science of Composting. Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
- Ghasemi, R. and Modirrahmati, A.R., 2003. Investigation on wood production of different poplar clones (closed crown) in Karaj area. Iranian Journal of Forest & Poplar Research, 11(3): 359-391 (In Persian).
- Hartmann, H.T. and Kester, D.E., 1983. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
- Higa, T. and Parr, J.F., 1994. Beneficial and Effective Microorganisms for a Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. International Nature Farming Research Center, Atmai, Japan.
- Hoitink, H.A.J., Rose, M.A., Zondag, R.A., 1997. Composted biosolids: an ideal organic amendment for container media supplying both nutrients and natural suppression of root rots. Special Circular Ohio Agricyltural Research and Development Center, 154: 58-61.
- Mansouri-Rad, D., 1997. Tractor and Agricultural Machines (translation). Bu-Ali Sina University Press, Hamedan, 520p (In Persian).
- Mossadegh, A., 2004. Afforestation and Forest Nursery (translation). Tehran University Press, Tehran, 516p (In Persian).
- Pamela M.G., 1991. Compost in a Hurry. University of California Press, Publication 8037
- Polpraset, C., 1989. Organic Waste Recycling. Asian Institute of Technology Bangkok, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
- Rolbiecki, R., Podsiadlo, C., Klimek, A. and Rolbiecki, S., 2007. Influence of micro-irrigation and organic fertilization on the growth of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings and the occurrence of soil mites in a post-arable land of two different sylvan-natural regions. Infrastructure & Ecology of Rural Areas, 187-195.
- Tata, M.H.L., Mindawati, N. and Prameswari, D., 2001. Compost made of forest debris: its quality and prospects as a seedling medium. Proceedings of workshop on the balance between biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of tropical rain forests. Indonesia, 6-8 Dec. 1999: 211-215

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics